“Raytheon 2” is a simple and rude feeling

In the praise of a fan, as a non-beauty powder non-hammer powder non-shake powder passers-by come to an objective (pseudo) comment. 

Marvel’s movie is really more and more mature, “Raytheon 2 “It’s like a work created on a factory assembly line. It’s like taking a ruler and measuring it. Where to have a smile, where to fight, where the play, where to sell the rot, the various parts of the arrangement of the standard, will not go wrong, but also too predictable … can 

see that “Raytheon 2” very pleasing fans, to loki The chemical reaction between thor and thor has increased more than a few times. The comics haven’t been seen clearly, but I believe it should be very satisfying to the comic fans. In the satisfaction of the fans, the average audience has also been considered, the action is quite a lot, the rhythm is not delayed, and the standard mentioned before is not wrong, and you should not be disappointed when you look at the big movie. And even if I think the film is general, you make me pick a thorn, I can’t pick anything. “Raytheon 2” is indeed a popcorn masterpiece, but it didn’t make me feel particularly deep. 

The sister who I watched together said that the Raytheon series is four words, simple and rude. I thought about what she said is quite right. I also know why I don’t particularly like “Raytheon 2”. 
“Raytheon 2” is good enough to satisfy the look and feel and fan psychology. Therefore, it gave up as a The comic book heroes are adapted from popcorn, and more importantly, as something that a movie should have. 

I may say that there may be some pretense, but I think that the production of “Raytheon 2” can only be described as “simple and rude”, using the simplest and most unprepared way to promote the development of the story, streamlining the film to only explode The part of the rice flower, what kind of psychological portrayal, the transition of the plot, etc. can be thrown away and discarded. After reading and forgetting, I can’t leave any impression. 

I am not asking for the depth and meaning of “Raytheon 2”. What is the demand for a commercial film?
I just think that even as a commercial film, don’t be purely killing or selling rot. I think that “Raytheon 2” is almost the same as “Special Forces”, although I don’t like this year’s “Wolverine”. 2″, but I have at least seen “Wolverine 2” has been carefully shaping the characters, to pave the background. The film of Marvel now is like a mold, full of craftsmanship. This year’s Disney Marvel’s two films, “Iron Man 3” and “Raytheon 2”, these two films are almost indistinguishable to me, can not see the director’s personal style, it is like a person to shoot. I think this is probably the inevitable result of the mature production system of Marvel. In these movies, the director should have no great initiative. 

In fact, it can be understood. After all, the film company is a businessman, making money first, and making comic movies so satisfying the needs of different people. After all, you can’t expect every director to shoot a movie like Batman like Nolan. This way of making it is the best choice in business and the least risk. 

Just as a fan, I still hope that the North American film market in the future will see that Marvel is different, and more sincere works appear, rather than being flooded by such “movie line products.” 

Responding to some downstairs responses, emphasizing two points 

1 I specifically emphasized that there is no requirement for Raytheon to have depth, in order to prevent those who do not move. What depth do you want in a commercial film, roll home and watch your literary film, and force it.” This silly X of brain-dead speech comes in. Is there nothing else in the movie except for the effects and depth? Emotional rendering, psychological portrayal, and excessive plots are all related to the so-called “depth.” X-Men, Spider-Man series, and even Iron Man, did not see the depth of Raytheon 2, as much as the content of Raytheon 2. It’s really 

hard to force people to force them. 2 I just said that Wolverine 2 “has the intention to shape the characters and go to the background.” It doesn’t mean that it is better than Raytheon 2, I said that Feng’s eyes are smaller than Qin’s eyes. Looks good, does it mean that Feng Sister is better than Qin Haiyan?